Whether the creditor's rights determined in the co

2022-07-31
  • Detail

Whether the creditor's rights determined in the demolition compensation and resettlement agreement have priority effect

[gist of the decision]

when the demolition compensation and resettlement agreement conflicts with other commercial housing sales contracts, the creditor's rights enjoyed by the demolished person in the demolition compensation and resettlement agreement have priority effect. The demolisher will sell the compensation and resettlement house to a third party. Even if the third party has gone through the house ownership registration, the demolished person can give priority to obtain the compensation and resettlement house for demolition based on the exclusive effect of the property right of the special creditor's rights. The change of the property right of the third party shall not be against the physical claim of the demolished person

[facts of the case]

1999, with the approval of Xinyi Municipal People's government, Xinyi Xing'an Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Xing'an company) developed the golden triangle phase II project in the south of the city's second farmers' market. On September 4 of the same year, Xinyi demolition and Removal Office issued a house demolition and removal permit to Xing'an company, the number of which was Kai Xu Zi (99) No. 35. In the process of demolition, it is necessary to demolish 10 suoshengzhi houses, with a building area of 248.5m2 (including 193.60m2 of houses in different streets with easily damaged parts), a usable area of 194.06m2, a house compensation of 98061.41 yuan, fixed attachments and other compensation of 12492.92 yuan, totaling 110554.33 yuan

on May 13, 2001, Xing'an company signed a house demolition and resettlement agreement (one of them) with suoshengzhi, which agreed to relocate to suoshengzhi 85m2 of business front room with the door of the first unit at the west end of Beiyan Street facing the East Building and the lower door facing the north. The resettlement price was 680 yuan per square meter, totaling 57800 yuan. Suoshengzhi asked Xing'an company for a price difference of 3800 yuan when she went to the house. Xing'an company as Party A, Suo Shengzhi as Party B, and Xinyi demolition office as the authentication authority signed or sealed the agreement (in which Suo Shengzhi's name was signed by his son suoxiangzhong)

since Xing'an company has no real estate development qualification, Xing'an company entrusted Xinyi Dongchen real estate development and construction engineering company (hereinafter referred to as Dongchen company) to develop and sell houses for the golden triangle phase II project. On november8,2001, Dongchen company signed a commercial housing reservation contract with hesume, the third party, to sell the No. 1 facade of the No. 1 commercial housing building of phase II of the Golden Triangle (i.e. the house to be relocated to suoshengzhi as agreed in the agreement on may13,2001) to hesume at the price of 546834.50 yuan. On may10,2002, the two sides signed a commercial housing sales contract, and the price was determined to be 499636.36 yuan. He Sumei paid the house price

since Xing'an company failed to relocate according to the agreement on the upward migration of a chemical material called reflectin, which was sprayed to the sticky surface containing graphene, the method included spraying a kind of chemical material to warn of the pretending ability of squid, soshengzhi sued on January 30, 2003, asking Xing'an company, Dongchen company Xinyi City Comprehensive Service Center for housing demolition and resettlement (hereinafter referred to as the "demolition and resettlement center") fulfilled the agreement on housing demolition and resettlement signed on may13,2001, and provided 85m2 of business front room with the door of unit 1 at the west end of Beiyan Street building facing the East Building and the lower door facing the north. During the original first instance, the court notified hesume to participate in the proceedings as a third person according to law. Later, due to the death of Suo Shengzhi during the original first instance proceedings, Suo Shengzhi's heirs huangxiaoying, Suo Xiangyun, Suo Xiangzhong, Suo Yu, Suo Baojia and Suo xiangxia participated in the proceedings as plaintiffs. On February 2, 2004, the court made a civil judgment (2003) xmcz No. 619: 1. The house purchase and sale contract signed between Dongchen company and he Sumei is legal and valid, and the No. 1 business room located in Building 1, golden triangle phase II commercial house, Xin'an Town, Xinyi City belongs to he Sumei. 2、 Xing'an company compensated the plaintiff for the loss of 499636.36 yuan, which was paid in a lump sum within ten days after the judgment took effect. 3、 Reject other claims of the plaintiff. 4、 The plaintiff's claims against the demolition and resettlement center and Dongchen company were rejected

6 the plaintiff in the original trial filed an appeal against the judgment of the first instance. The intermediate people's Court of Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province made the final judgment (2004) xmyz No. 1255 on August 8, 2004: rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment

after the original judgment of the first and second instance of this case came into effect, he Sumei handled the house ownership certificate on September 2, 2004, with the certificate number of Xinyi house ownership certificate Xin'an Zhen Zi No

VI. the plaintiff in the original trial refused to accept the judgment of the first and second instance and applied to Xuzhou intermediate people's court for retrial. On may30,2005, the court made a civil ruling (2005) xmyishenjianzi No. 068 and decided to retry the case. On June 10 of the same year, the court made a decision (2005) xmyzz No. 063: rescind the court's (2004) xmyzz No. 1255 civil judgment and the court's (2003) xmcz No. 619 civil judgment, and return the case to the court for retrial

After retrial, the people's Court of Xinyi City, Jiangsu Province, in accordance with Articles 128 and 184 of the civil procedure law, Article 48, paragraph 2 of Article 54 and article 107 of the contract law, and Article 7, paragraph 1, of the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of disputes over commercial housing purchase and sale contracts, made the following judgment: 1 The No. 1 business house located in Building 1, golden triangle phase II commercial house, Xin'an Town, Xinyi City (i.e. the house marked with the Certificate No. of Xin'an Zhen Zi of xin'yi housing right certificate) belongs to the plaintiff of the sixth original trial. 2、 He Sumei shall return the above-mentioned house to Xing'an company and Dongchen company within 30 days after this judgment takes effect. 3、 After receiving the house, Xing'an company and Dongchen company immediately delivered it to the plaintiff of the sixth original trial. 4、 Reject the litigation claim of the plaintiff of the sixth original trial against the demolition and resettlement center. After the judgment of this case, he Sumei and Dongchen company filed an appeal, and the Xuzhou intermediate people's court made a final judgment on January 22, 2007: the appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld. The judgment has taken legal effect

[evaluation and analysis]

the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of disputes over commercial housing sales contracts (hereinafter referred to as the interpretation) was promulgated on April 28, 2003 and came into force on June 1 of the same year. The case that the plastic granulator industry should continuously improve its technical level is a typical commercial housing sales contract dispute case after the implementation of the interpretation. The key to hearing this case well is how to accurately grasp the law embodied in Article 7 of the interpretation

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI